Friday, June 22, 2018

Review: "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom" is a cocktail that tastes bitter.

Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom Review

I'd like to share something with you.

An idea that nearly happened way out in Hollywood.

There was a time when Steven Spielberg was busy at work, trying to get a fourth "Jurassic Park" movie off the ground. This was around 2005 and he worked hard on a version of a fourth "Jurassic Park" film until around 2007. He got William Monahan, who wrote "The Departed," to write a script, and the script was wild. Imagine a "Jurassic Park" movie where a mercenary leads a group of humanoid dinosaurs  fighting bad guys and saving missing children. It was the craziest thing ever attempted in this franchise, and also just in general. But it would have at least tried to revitalize a franchise that produced three films which were exactly the same. 

Colin Trevorrow made "Jurassic World" in 2015, and it seemed like his goal was to revitalize the "Jurassic Park" franchise. Sadly, "Jurassic World" is just like the three previous "Jurassic Park" movies, they are all the same. They are four excuses to get people on the island for some dinosaur mayhem. Sure, there is a certain amount of charisma with the hiring of Chris Pratt. But this franchise has never been about the characters or their development. This franchise has been about wowing its audience with dinosaur visuals. This franchise has been more about the dinosaur mayhem. The characters basically work has placeholders, cardboard cutouts needed to move each scene along with the films bigger stars.

I bring up the almost "Jurassic Park 4" because I see lots of parallels between the Monahan script and the finished product of "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom." The movie begins with mercenaries looking for bones and DNA, and of course as these movies go, they get attacked by dinosaurs on the island. Mercenaries were the main characters from Monahan's script. Then we see some news footage of a volcano on the Jurassic island ready to blow. Some people want to evacuate the dinosaurs off that island, others want to leave them there and let them die. In Monahan's script, the news footage showed dinosaurs hitting up the mainland. A new character named Benjamin Lockwood (James Cromwell) is eventually introduced, and apparently Lockwood designed the first dinosaurs with John Hammond. This all completely retcons the entire canon of "Jurassic Park" as we know it, but whatever. Lockwood's aide Eli Mills (Rafe Spall) hires Claire Dearing (Bryce Dallas Howard) to help Lockwood's people get all the dinosaurs off the island and onto a different sanctuary island. No volcano or danger and no humans allowed, letting the dinosaurs live out the rest of their lives secluded in peace.

To help, Claire then turns to Owen Grady (Chris Pratt), and I can't help but see lots of the mercenary character from the "Jurassic Park 4" script in Grady. In that script, the lead mercenary had to go back to the island and get some DNA because Hammond was going to design some dinosaurs to kill the renegade dinosaurs hitting up the mainland. In "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom," Owen, Claire and Lockwood's mercenaries go and try to save the dinosaurs. But of course, its not that easy. There are more mustache-twirling human villains this time out, and nobody who they seem. The first half of "Fallen Kingdom" regards this rescue mission, but the second half becomes so different that it feels like a different movie entirely. Lockwood is planning to sell the dinosaurs to the highest bidder, along with Dr. Wu (B.D. Wong) who became the de facto human villain of this new stretch of franchise. Of course Claire and Owen try to stop them.

There are definitely some parallels between the original "Jurassic Park 4" script and what is going on in the franchise now. I don't want to give away anymore secrets of "Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom," but I could see them heading in a much wackier direction. I really would have loved to see the original idea for "Jurassic Park 4" and until they head that direction, I'll start being more interested in this franchise. "Fallen Kingdom" is so disjointed being a two-in-one experience that it hurts the movie. The secret to movies is keep your storyline simple, then again all four previous "Jurassic Park" films were fairly simple and that didn't help.

I think the biggest problem with these movies is that they refuse to write good human characters. Chris Pratt is fine, but he's more charisma than character, and so is Howard. They both do what they were hired to do, but they don't have characters to play. James Cromwell gets as much mileage out his character as he can, but he's not written convincingly enough to make an impact. Neither is Rafe Spall's character. Neither is the smarmy dinosaur seller played by Toby Jones. Neither is the generic mercenary played by Ted Levine. Its all about the dinosaurs, and when all of our characters are on the island, its the best stretch of the film, because the dinosaurs are front and center. The second of the film features mostly a human story. So we need strong human characters to carry us through until the end and we just don't get that here.

Not even Jeff Goldblum's cameo could save this from being just another pandering experience. Out of all the movie franchises out there, "Jurassic Park" really has never hit my sweet spot the way it has for so many others. I think that mainly there isn't a convincing story to tell. The human characters aren't strong enough to tell a good story. Once the humans are created with the strong passion of the dinosaurs, I'll start caring more about this franchise.


Wednesday, June 20, 2018

Creed 2 Trailer

I loved "Creed"

Even though it was a movie built on the spine of the original "Rocky," there was enough character, theme and story that made it all feel like it was something of its own. I thought for sure it was just another naked cash grab, and it ended up being a favorite of mine. Something that you could happily and shamelessly place next to the best of the "Rocky" series. I couldn't believe how well it worked, and now I have to say how ready I am for a sequel.

Apollo Junior versus Drago Junior. Oh yeah, get ready.


Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Review: "Hereditary" is frighteningly unsettling and ambitiously muddled

Hereditary Review
There have been several different types, styles and conventions in the horror genre that have established themselves firmly in genre itself. So much so, that fans of this type of movie have drawn lines in sand, declaring that only their favorite brand of horror is the only true form, and everything else is just a imitation. Me? I love it all. I've always loved it all. I love the goriest of zombie movies, and I love the most explicit of body horror movies. I've been fond of a few found footage movies, and I am sucker for dreadful mood and atmosphere.

There seems to be a sub-genre that is beginning to assert itself once again in horror canon, and again, horror fans are taking their side on the battlefield. Over the course of running this blog, I have posted positive reviews of both "It Follows" and "The Witch" and in both cases, I got shit for it. It seems many people, especially people my age, can't come to terms with a horror movie that is a slow-burn. We've been conditioned by Hollywood to believe that a bunch of young "actors" running around sweaty, getting killed in stylish ways is the only true way to scare somebody, but that's not even remotely true. We all are different as human beings, and we all have different fears. Something that might make one person feel brave may weaken the sensibilities of another, and that's why there are so many styles of horror movie, and why some of them work on others.

"Hereditary" is another film in line with "It Follows" and "The Witch," its another slow-burn modern horror movie, and if that isn't good enough for you. If you need the gore and the screaming children and the boo scares, then this isn't for you. If you long for mood and atmosphere and if you love the tension being turned up at a snails pace, then you'll end up enjoying "Hereditary" very much. It's a very well acted film. Its one of those movies that has just the right score which only heightens your senses that they turn to terror. I don't think it all adds up story-wise, and it may come as a surprise that I am ultimately still recommending the movie despite that. I'll let you in on a little secret, there have been plenty of horror films that don't make much sense logic-wise, but still have the ability to scare. ("Suspiria" being an incredible example of this) You can build some genuine dread even if your story doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

The thing though is that you have somewhat of an idea what the story means or maybe the director intended you to piece things together on your own without being spoonfed story. I am still on the road as to what the intention of "Hereditary" is though. There is clearly a story being told, but there is still so much left unanswered that it kind comes to a frustrating conclusion. The first hour and a half is full is enough to keep you freaked out, and I will even say that the ending is wildly ambitious. I don't need all the answers at the end of a movie, but I want to feel like those who made the movie have those answers. As this film ended, I truly wasn't sure.

Toni Collette plays Anne Graham, and when we meet her, she's at the funeral of her mother. Anne's mother was suffering for a horrible illness before passing away, and it's left a hefty dent on Anne. Anne cared for her and before anything involving her mother began, she suffered from depression. Her husband Steve (Gabriel Bryne) fears her depression may be making a comeback. All the while very strange feelings are beginning to fall on Anne's children Peter (Alex Wolff) and Charile (Milly Shapiro). That's just one side of the coin though, as the movie wears on, it gets weirder and weirder. First, the movie seems to focus on Anne, then it seems to shift to Charlie and then to Peter. As the story gets weirder and shifts perspective, I started to get confused by who the main character was supposed to be, but at the same time, I wrapped up in the terror of it all. There are moments in this film that I think horror fans are going to be discussing for the rest of the year, and I know for myself there are images that I am not going to be able to shake.

Toni Collette does astounding work all the time, especially when she's in a horror movie and I am blown away by how underrated she is. She stears many of the scenes and emotions in this movie, and she drives the entire movie with aplomb. A horror movie isn't anything without creepy kids, and both Wolff and Shapiro came to creep you out, and we get ultimate creep factor out of both of them. Ann Dowd shows up later in the movie. If you've seen her on "The Handmaid's Tale," then she's probably already invaded your nightmares. Dowd is downright freaky in this movie, and I was fascinated by all of her scenes.

This is certainly an ambitious moment for A24, a studio that's been hard at work for awhile building an original slate of films. "Hereditary" fits in nicely with the rest of its filmography. There is plenty to like here, if you are a certain horror fan. You may get frustrated with where the story goes structurally, but there is so much terror on display that's hard not to have a goood time.


Monday, June 18, 2018

Review: "Incredibles 2" is a worthy, fun-filled, and brilliant follow-up

Incredibles 2 Review

Pixar has been a champion box office machine, but its also been a studio that has kept creativity and storytelling front and center for many of its movies. It's a studio that has earned the right amount of clout that, even as a 29-year-old man, even though they specialize in family films, I'll watch anything they release, without a trailer, bar none. They have earned that right, and not many studios nor individuals have garnered such an honor.

But I will admit, its been a chore to watch some Pixar films, yes you read that correctly. Ever since the turn of the decade, Pixar has been playing the sequel game. Besides the "Toy Story" sequels, the slew of sequels that Pixar has created have been less than amazing. I don't care that much for the "Cars" sequels, and I thought "Monsters Anniversary" was a wet blanket. I also didn't think "Finding Dory" was anything that special. After making the perfect trilogy in "Toy Story," I had faith that Pixar could even do sequels, but that faith has been tested mightily already. Now, I am very uneasy about a "Toy Story 4" coming out next year.

Easily my favorite of the Pixar films has always been "The Incredibles." You can probably blame my lifelong fascination with superheroes on that, but I can't help myself. "The Incredibles" is for a lack of a better word, incredible. It's such a clever take on the superhero genre, a fun spin on how the superhero movie works, and yes, even had a great message about being special in this world, and what exactly that means. While I've secretly wanted a sequel for a long time, I was worried that Pixar may not do it justice, and just shell one out a sequel just for quick cash. When it comes to their sequels, they seemed to have abandoned the one thing that made them special as a studio, creativity and storytelling. 

Alas, an "Incredibles" sequel got made. It's fourteen years later, and I've always had a theory that the more years you move away from a certain movie, the less relevant it becomes. There have been plenty of sequels to movies that were twenty or even thirty years old that just didn't feel right because they were so far removed. This plus the trouble Pixar has with sequels left a very bad taste in my mouth, and I was ready to right the whole thing off. It didn't help that the trailers made the film look like a mere clone of the first film.

Maybe it was lowered expectations, maybe it was my genuine love for the original film, but I left my viewing of "The Incredibles 2" with a huge smile on my face. Not only is "The Incredibles 2" a worthwhile sequel, not only is a good movie, Brad Bird has directed and written another incredible installment of this series. Brad Bird wrote and directed the first film too, and he seems to have a good handle on the characters he created, and time seems to not have slowed down his ideas and how this wonderful family of superheroes work. Bird cooked up another solid story to pit these characters against and mixed with the colorfully brilliant animation that we've come to expect from Pixar, you are in for one wild ride.

So remember The Underminer from the first film? He showed up right as the credits began to roll? John Ratzenberger from "Cheers" provided his voice? Well keep him in your thoughts because "The Incredibles 2" begins with that showdown after Dash's track meet. The fight with The Underminer goes less than well for The Parr family and they fail to stop The Underminer from robbing a bank, causing serious damage in the process. While the city appreciated that the superheroes defeated Syndrome in the last movie, the idea of damage and accountability are still fresh, and the Parr family have to relocate again. The leaders of the world are planning to come together to discuss the fate of all superhero activity and all the Parr family can do is wait.

Soon after relocating, Winston Deavor (voiced by Bob Odenkirk) of DEVTECH has a plan for a publicity stunt to get public favor back for the superheroes and he plans to use Elastigirl (Holly Hunter) in a new city for this stunt, she's picked because she's the least destructive of the entire family. So Elastigirl goes on these secret missions while Mr. Incredible (Craig T. Nelson) stays home with the kids. He's a little jealous at first that Deavor doesn't want to use him, but if his wife is the only way for him to get back into a super suit to fight crime, then he firmly stands next to his wife. This all leads to a showdown with Screenslaver, a mysterious villain who is connected to the plot.

That's all I'll say about the plot. So many sequels are built on the spine of the previous film and while "The Incredibles 2" may look like it does that to a certain degree, there is so much fun to be had, so much that is still so creative that I couldn't help but love it. Sure, you could look at it at a service value and just say that its like the first film but Elastigirl is going on the missions instead of Mr. Incredible. But the movie's story works as a new challenge for the family as a whole, not just one parent keeping a secret from the rest of her family. The villain twist from the first film felt a bit obvious, whereas the villain twist here isn't who you'd expect. The movie doesn't really deal with the more of the same regarding relocation acts or anything, instead it plays similar to "Captain America: Civil War" where the movie's general theme is whether or not superheroes are a force of real good in the world. Screenslaver works kind of like Zemo did in "Civil War" excepts with brand new motivations and a slew of new gadgets at his disposal. While you may see a similar connection from the first film, its not something that derails the movie.

Plus, more Jack-Jack. It's just amazing. The scene where Jack-Jack, the literal infant of the family who somehow has an over-abundance of superpowers, fights a raccoon is the highlight of the movie. Jack-Jack literally steals the show. So much so that if Brad Bird goes for three, I'd love a slightly grown-up version of Jack-Jack, in a "Legion" type movie, but that will never happen so I'm essentially talking out of my ass. I just love Jack-Jack so much in this movie. 

In conclusion, it seems like Pixar has put my theories of sequels to bed. Maybe Pixar can make a fun, daring, and yes creative sequel if they really put their mind to it. "The Incredibles 2" is the movie I hoped for for over a decade. I am so glad that we got another adventure with this family, and now I can only hope we can continually check in on this family, seeing how they are doing as the years wear on. Pixar has once again gained my faith back and they continue to keep me curious about all of their work.


Sunday, June 17, 2018

Unfriended: Dark Web trailer

There was a movie that came out a few years ago, 2015 if I remember correctly, called "Unfriended." I reviewed it here for the site. If you remember correctly, I wasn't much of a fan of it. I figured that I'd forget and never have to think of it again. But astonishingly, there is a sequel coming out later this year.

Now, the first film dealt with a ghost getting revenge on a bunch of kids who were on a Facetime/Skype type call one night. This sequel looks like it is leaving the supernatural aspect behind, doing something different. In this trailer, it looks like a group on a Facetime/Skype style call find out one of their friends stole a laptop, and that the laptop contains sensitive material on it revolving the Dark Web, a place full of illegal activity. A group within the Dark Web find out and track the stolen laptop. They begin to mess with the group, and take them out one by one. Or at least that's what it looks from the trailer.

I wasn't much of a fan of the first film. I can't build lots of sympathy for person who stole a laptop. That's always the biggest thing when it comes to horror movies. If you are making a horror movie about young people getting killed, you better make sure we care about who is getting killed. Otherwise you are going to have a film full of random death. This looks to be another crapfest, but I hope I'm wrong.

Thursday, June 14, 2018

World of Jokers

So just this past week, there has been lots of Joker news. I am talking about THE JOKER, the popular Batman villain. A few months back, I reported on a Joker origin movie. The movie was to be directed by Todd Phillips (director of The Hangover) and the crime movie god himself Martin Scorsese was going to produce the movie. The film was set to star Joaquin Phoenix as The Joker himself. Apparently, its still happening, but with a budget drop. Yesterday, it was reported that the movie will have a $55 million budget, I have no idea what the budget was before but apparently there was a drop.

I actually thought that maybe the Phoenix-Phillips-Scorsese Joker movie was kaput, since it was also reported this week that Jared Leto will be getting a solo Joker movie. The same Joker Jared Leto played in "Suicide Squad." This news is a little surprising since "Suicide Squad" became fairly unpopular and Leto's Joker was highly criticized. Now apparently he will be getting his own movie soon. No plans so far, or what it would even be about, but it is in the works.

Will our film industry get over-saturated with Joker flicks? Will these movies come out around the same time? Is Warner Brothers trying to create its own "Armageddon-Deep Impact" scenario where they are the only winner? Will anything about these movies be profitable? Well, honestly, people love The Joker so perhaps one of them will make some dough. How if at all will these movies relate back to the DCEU, and if they aren't, what's the point?

We'll see how these ideas materialize. DC and Warner Brothers are promising lots of things for a franchise that hasn't been solely popular, so I wonder what will happen here.


Wednesday, June 13, 2018

Dumbo Trailer

I know some people find it a bit shameless that Disney is cashing in on their old animated classics by simply turning them into live-action tales. But you know, I have to hand it to the studio. The live-action conversations have been good, by and large, and I've been enjoying what I've been seeing so far. Perhaps the nostalgia train is working for me, but I would be lying if I didn't say that I like the live action versions in general.

One of the next live action films on the Disney docket is "Dumbo" coming next year. It is being directed by Tim Burton, who thought made the only crummy live action Disney film. Yep, I didn't care for his "Alice In Wonderland" films at all. So I was totally was not onboard for another Burton adaptation. But the first teaser for "Dumbo" actually looks quite majestic. It sounds like they will be playing pretty close to the original source material for this. The film will star Colin Ferrell, Danny DeVito, Micheal Keaton (Batman and Penguin reunited!) and Eva Green.

Doesnt look like the typical Burton fair, but perhaps that's a good thing.

Can't wait to see more!

Monday, June 11, 2018

Review: "Ocean's 8" is much more than meets the eye

Ocean's 8 Review

I really like girl power in movies, and I certainly don't mind seeing female-led movies. Some of my favorite movie heroes are Sarah Connor and Trinity and Ellen Ripley and The Bride. I don't mind remakes of movies about women. With all of this said, it comes off as nothing more than a politically correct publicity stunt now that we are living in a all-women craze. Let's remake every successful movie but with all women! It's a nice thought, but it's a dead-end creatively and a perfect reminder that there are several people out there who misunderstand what this is all about. A few years ago, there were many screaming for Charlize Theron to play a female James Bond, when James Bond being a womanizer has always been part of his character. Were they planning on making this female James Bond a lesbian? If not, then simply calling a female spy James Bond isn't James Bond, it would be something else, so why not just embrace that something else? I would rather see an entire series of "Atomic Blonde," another spy movie starring Theron, then having her play a female James Bond simply because the Social Justice Warrior populace is asking for it.

That was my biggest problem with the female-led "Ghostbusters" a few years ago. It had absolutely nothing new, exciting or innovative to offer. It was a publicity stunt for the sake of it, a shameless way to make a few extra bucks off of a franchise that should have been left alone. Sadly, its tough to really discuss this, since even remotely suggesting it means I am anti-women, and that's just sad all around. You are responsible for the art you create and once you've created something it belongs to the audience. If the audience denounces it, then that's that, it doesn't mean that everyone is anti-feminism. The female-led "Ghostbusters" movie was not funny, despite all the good talent involved, it referred to the old movies simply for referring to them, the special effects were good if the year was 1995 and it just felt like more of the same instead of doing something fun with the universe.

I still can't fathom why these "remakes with all women" are still on the rise, and I was prepared to not give two shits about "Ocean's 8." Much like the original "Ocean's 11," its filled with great talent, like Sandra Bullock, Cate Blanchett, Anne Hathaway, Rhianna, Mindy Kaling, Helena Boneham Carter and even Richard Armitage. Sandra Bullock is Debbie Ocean, a mastermind who recruits a group of all-women criminals for a big heist. It already sounded like more of the same but with a PC twist, and that sounded like a waste of time.

"Ocean's 8" begins like the original did too, with a camera facing a distraught Debbie Ocean, in jail garb. The camera stays on her the whole time during a conversation about parole, you never see who she's talking to. This entire technique was used in the first film and its so shamelessly pulled from the original that I thought I was going to see a repeat of 2016's "Ghostbusters," a mere remake of a great movie with nothing but a political stunt being the only worth to see it. I was ready to hate it, I was ready to have so much of my time wasted.

I was ready for a lot of things. But then I kept watching. Sandra Bullock and Cate Blanchett are great in everything they do, they are some of my favorites. Richard Armitage is wonderful when he's snarky and unappealing, and he made a good foil for Bullock's character. James Corden shows up as an insurance fraud investigator and does some nice work. Anne Hathaway is good, but it always depends on the role. Sarah Paulson is a superstar from TV who seemed to transition well to the big screen. Mindy Kaling has some good comedic timing. So maybe I thought it wouldn't be a complete waste of time, and as I continued to watch the movie, the women did an impeccable job bringing these characters to life. I was also surprised to see that the movie IS NOT a remake. It's a continuation of the George Clooney movies. Debbie Ocean is Danny Oceans sister, Elliot Gould and Qin Shaobo from Clooney's movies make appearances here (Matt Damon also had a cameo in the movie, but it got cut). I appreciated that this took place in the same universe, instead of being a tepid attempt at something new. (It actually made me sad to learn that Danny Ocean is now deceased, making no room for a crossover of any kind. BOO!)

George Clooney's movies were all about criminals who were smart, cool and hip. Those movies were clever and slick. I wouldn't call "Oceans 8" clever or slick, but that doesn't mean that it tries hard to please. This is a movie about smart movie, but it has its own identity, it has its own feel and I applaud that the movie has its own beating heart, instead of merely trying to be what Clooney's movie was back in 2001. There is still plenty of fun to be had here, and its beating with a pulse of its own heart. That I can appreciate quite a bit.

I thought that it was a little disappointing that Sandra's character and Richard's character were once dating, and this whole plan just boils down to a revenge heist. That simply just copies too much on what was done before and I wished for a little more imagination when coming up with a reason to assemble all of these criminals. I also found it to be a bit cheesy that all the pop songs that appear in the movie are songs about women. It seems just a little cliche and a little too on-the-nose to be taken seriously. But perhaps that's the point the filmmakers were trying to make, trying to make something that was one-the-nose. The thing is, the movie already mostly works as just a caper film. Something fun and fresh, you don't need all that cliche stuff to remind the audience that you're making an all women movie. Just leave it how it is.

I know "Oceans 8" is continuation of a popular franchise, but it truly doesn't feel like any other movies out right now. I am glad that I was pleasantly surprised by this. I don't completely love it, but I found "Oceans 8" to be mostly enjoyable. In a blooming summer season, you probably will too.


Sunday, June 10, 2018

"The Predator" trailer

The film franchise that is "Predator" has been all over the place since its inception. Some of the original movies are pretty good, nothing that blows my mind though. "Alien vs. Predator" may have been fun in concept, but horrible in execution. Sorry folks, but I can't even stand it as dumb fun. The remake by Robert Rodriguez from 2010 that had an all-star cast was so profoundly pedestrian that it never got the franchise off its feet. I've had a rough relationship with this franchise, so its hard for me to get too excited over a new movie.

I like Shane Black as a director, but I like it when he's able to thrive with his own material, the most corporate thing he did was "Iron Man 3" and its the only MCU movie I return to the most for pleasure. Has he learned something since then? He's got a killer cast to work with here including Sterling K. Brown, Olivia Munn, Jacob Trembley, Alfie Allen, Thomas Jane, Yvonne Strahovski, "Moonlight's" Trevante Rhodes, Keegan Michael-Key, and Boyd Hollbrook (who I swear looks like a grown-up Tom Felton). That's quite the line-up, and I hope they all shine, but there better be a story worth telling here.

Halloween trailer

I always liked the original "Halloween." Its one of the best horror films ever made. Bar none. Yes, its a slasher movie, but it helped define that subgenre that may not be as popular as it once was. Plus, for its time "Halloween" is impressive because it didn't rely on blood and sex and exploitative violence to be "Scary." The movie truly is all about terror, and that's what I love about it. I have it in my collection of movies, and I love watching it every October.

The sequels? Not so much. The remakes? Absolutely fucking not. I thought the franchise was dead for sure. But David Gordon Green is now taking a stab at it, reviving it after many years. He's bringing Jamie Lee Curtis back as Laurie and continuing her story. I love that idea, and the movie itself looks like its going to be high on dread. Yes, it looks more violent than the original movie. Violence doesn't bother me, but you better use it towards building some genuine terror. We shall see what happens, but for right now. Looks good.

Thursday, June 7, 2018

Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse Trailer

It's been awhile since I put the words "excited" and "Sony" and "Spider-Man" all in one sentence. But I have got to admit that I am excited for Sony's upcoming Spider-Man film. Instead of playing with the Tom Holland continuity from the MCU, this is a brand new adventure focusing on Miles Morales.

For those who don't know who Miles Morales is, there is an alternate universe in the Marvel multiverse known as the Ultimate Marvel Universe, where characters were updated, and made more realistic. The Ulitmate Marvel Universe was on the rise in the 2000's when many comic book readers were jaded by the outdated characters with their long, confusing continuity problems. There were some changes made in this universe. Peter Parker would eventually train another person with spider-like powers and when Parker eventually died, this person stepped in to fill his shoes. This person was Miles Morales. Morales became such a popular character that he was integrated into the mainstream Marvel comics universe in 2015.

This movie is slightly based on a Spider-Man story where all the different versions of Spider-Man across all the Marvel multi-verse came together. There was a bad guy named Morlun who was traveling across the multiverse killing anybody with spider-like powers. Telling from this trailer, I don't know if we'll see Morlun, he doesn't seem to appear anywhere. I know that The Green Goblin (a very different version compared to the mainstream counterpart) and The Kingpin will appear. Who knows what other secrets this film will reveal.

I really like the unique animation in this movie and there is some incredible talent as far as voice acting goes. This could be a good one!

Review: "Fahrenheit 451" is a uneven, disjointed adaptation of Ray Bradbury's classic

Fahrenheit 451 Review

There is a reason why Ray Bradbury is one of the most well-known science fiction writers ever. Not only that, but helped define the genre and mold it into what it is today. No easy feat that, and "Fahrenheit 451" was one of his greatest writings. Set in the future, we follow the life of a firemen, but not your typical firemen. The firemen of the future set books to flame, because nearly every book is outlawed, in fact, most people rarely, if ever, get out and enjoy nature. They are constantly in front of digital screens. Not only that, but there is little to no privacy. Sound familiar yet? Ever since Facebook was in lieu of the recent Presidential election, its a little creepy to realize that Bradbury might have been up to something very real with his classic novel.

Conspiracy theories aside, the 2018 adaptation features an even creepier version of this. Each building in which this movie takes place has high screens (much like explained in the original novel), the book burnings in the movie have become a sport, and social media icons float by like in those live Facebook videos as firemen gleefully put torch to various piles of literature. It's a disturbing, slightly horrendous sight, and as the generations quickly slouch into their comfiest chairs and dig their heads into their cell phones, I feel like its easy to see a future similar to this. The most interesting thing about the HBO adaptation, which originally premiered at the Cannes Film Festival last May, was the dark look into the future.

Yes, you read that correctly, the look into the future is the most interesting thing about the movie. Sure, Michael B. Jordan plays Montag, the firemen who we view this world through and his partner Beatty, played by Michael Shannon. Both Jordan and Shannon are, as expected, very good in this. But Montag has been reduced to a typical stock good guy and Beatty is his mustache-twirling counterpart. Sofia Boutella plays Clairsse, a wonderful, provocative character in the book. A character that dies early, but leaves a massive impact on Montag in the book. Here, she's your typical love interest, and she's much older so that Montag doesn't come off like a creep. No wife for this Montag, he's given a cliche-ridden love interest instead.

I can't remember every single detail of the book, but I don't remember "Farenheit 451" being a simple action movie and a cat-and-mouse chaser. I know that in the book, the firemen began their new job after the world slowly began to no longer see worth in books and that most writings went on a blacklist because their contents were too offensive. I think in the world where Political Correctness tends to go overboard in certain aspects, and how Social Justice Warriors have to put their two cents on everything, a close adaptation would have been very realized today. Unfotunately in the movie, there is no need to push the films big ideas, its too busy showing radicals being chased by firemen. They don't even do much of a job explaining this world, just some minor lip service as the film begins. Very inconsequential stuff. 

While there is plenty to enjoy, and plenty that is eye-opening. And shoot, there is plenty here that is even entertaining, "Farenheit 451" is slightly disappointing. A movie that wants to appear smart, but has no idea what its really trying to say nor any idea on how to say it. 


Tuesday, June 5, 2018

Suspiria Trailer

"Suspiria" is often lauded as one of the best horror films ever made. It has often be labeled a "Disney Horror Movie" and its interesting because its kind of correct. The colors are bright, the mood is very fairy tale-like, and the atmosphere is epic and almost like the pages of a story come to life. Apparently, if you set it to the music of "Snow White and the Seven Dwarves" it goes along with the movie flawlessly.

"Suspira" came out in 1977, and it centers around an American dance student transferring to a German dance Academy. After a series of brutal murders, she realizes that the school is a front for a supernatural conspiracy. That's my best guess though, I actually don't really know what the movie is about. There is so much strange material in the movie, you could shake a stick at it. I saw the movie last year, I want to say. While the movie piles on the dread and the scares, its not the scary movie I expected. I never once feared for a bad dream in the night I watched it, and I ended up being correct.

A remake of the movie is coming out later this year. It will star Dakota Johnson and Chloe Mortez. While I groaned at this revelation, the trailer itself actually looks pretty cool. I read that some of the footage from the movie was viewed at the Cannes Film Festival in France last month, and it was getting people pretty nauseated if the report is to be believed. The trailer released is full of great mood, and I am wildly curious to check it out. I am not sure if its going to be a straight up remake, but perhaps the spine of the movies will be similar while the story itself is different, a la "Ocean's Eleven."

The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part Trailer

If you remember in 2014, I LOVED, LOVED, LOVED "The LEGO Movie." I liked it so much more than I thought I would. I loved how clever the movie was, and how it had something very interesting to say adults strange relationship with their toys and how potentially dangerous it can be living in a world full of nostalgia. There is some discussion in certain films about how potentially damaging nostalgia can be, and I think "The LEGO Movie" did a fun, wonderful job exploring that. "The LEGO Batman" movie took some liberties making a parody about The Caped Crusader and as a life-long Batman fan, I really loved it.

I thought that maybe a second LEGO movie would be more of the same, but I am not so sure that is the case. This looks to be in a dystopian future, after Taco Tuesday. It seems like the little sister from the first movie's LEGO's began to take over. I love that this looks to be a direct sequel to the first film, and its funny that the movie is going "Mad Max" in terms of style. It looks like this is going to be a Man On A Mission movie instead of A Chosen One sequel, and I am curious to see if the team behind this movie will slyly and hilariously lambast the Man ON A Mission genre, just like they did with The Chosen One style movie.